Thursday, August 27, 2009

Unemployment Sucks, Like You, Like Me.

I have removed the text of this blog post because it's public, and people might see it and get the wrong idea. You can probably find it archived somewhere if you really want to. Here's the deal.

I wrote a rather profane post in frustration at my job search. What really frustrates me about looking for jobs is all the ass-kissing and lying. I know when I apply for a job half the other applicants have inflated their résumés. I stood in line at a job fair in college while a young woman in front of me claimed she spent 120 hours in an average week on coursework (which leaves under 7 hours per day for sleeping, eating, and all that other stuff you need to do to function as a human being). Then she said she loved fast-paced work environments. Maybe if she got her work done at a faster pace she wouldn't have to spend so much time on it.

The posturing of the job search is totally ridiculous. Some job advice columnists want you to go at every employer like their company is your dream. There is a handful of companies that I would really love to work for because I think they do great and important work. There are others I wouldn't even apply at. At most jobs the relationship on some level is, "I'll do your dirty work and you pay me your dirty money." I'll do the best job I can, because, you know, why else bother showing up? I also know if I'm totally honest about that, I'll never be employed anywhere. I worked for a market research company studying direct mail marketing (mostly credit cards) when I lived in Chicago. I think most of their clients are absolute scumbags. I did a good job. They paid me. That's how it is sometimes; I don't think any of the programmers there had illusions otherwise, and I don't even think the research and marketing teams did. But anyone giving you advice on your job search will tell you that you'd better pucker up. "Direct mail is so fascinating, tell me more!"

I think that's really it. Job searching was and is frustrating. I hate feeling dishonest talking to people. And that's why I wrote that little rant that's now been erased.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Murderous Felines Magazine!

J: Luther just looks so cute with his big begging eyes.
A: But sometimes those eyes can be creepy... he'll tilt his head with a stiff, doll-like motion. Hello, I am Kitty Ruxpin, and I am going to kill you in your sleep..
J: Hey, I liked Teddy Ruxpin!

... the next morning ...

J (holding Rudy): Rudy is giving me his crazy eyes.
A: Rudy's crazy eyes say, "I'm going to kill you now." Luther's crazy eyes say, "I'm going to kill you... later."
J: Rudy is a cat of the present.
A: And Luther has patience. He knows life is long. His life, anyway.

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Why everyone likes classical music

Today Dan Linsenmann sent me this link, to a talk by Benjamin Zander. A cool performance, for sure, and I have some thoughts about it and its subject matter.

First, I don't know much Schenker, but I've heard enough about it to recognize that Zander's explanation of the Chopin prelude was at least along similar lines. One of the people that's explained Schenkerian analysis to me loves it and the other hates it. In this case, identifying the important notes and the simple descending pattern they follow allowed the audience to understand the structure of the piece. That was cool -- I think usually people can't follow the structure of classical pieces that they hear, and the phrases, even if they're beautiful, lose their direction and meaning in their minds. Understanding something about the overall structure changes that.

But the bigger thoughts I have are about the decline of classical music. He says that only 3% of people are really classical music fans; why is that and what does it mean? Is it something that can be changed by getting people to appreciate it, or does it have to do with the music itself?

Today we take for granted a split between the classical and pop music worlds. I assume that by classical music Zander means what is often today called "art music", which might come pretty close to the conception that people have of it. Highly-trained people making culture in a very formal setting. Even when the audience is sitting on folding chairs in a flat in Pilsen, basically the same ritual is performed. And pop music looks just the opposite. Enterprising people work out simple, catchy tunes and broadcast them using loudspeakers over the shouts of the crowd.

I have long thought that there was room for both of these kinds of music, but that what we have today is an even wider split than art vs. pop: academic vs. commercial. Much "important" art music today is incomprehensible to even very well educated people. As recently as 1913 audiences cared enough to fight and riot at the premiere of Le Sacre du Printemps; can anyone picture a classical audience rioting today? I saw a talk on and performance of John Cage's works when I was in college. Many of the people seated around me were School of Music students required to attend for one class or another, and most were skeptical or hostile to Cage's music. They whispered among themselves and one walked out. The speakers and performers went on and on about the triumph of Cage's music over the philistines that loudly bashed it in the 50s. Did they even suspect that most of the audience was only there for a grade? Or that maybe now, in the 21st century, the only reason people don't write scathing reviews of Cage anymore is that they don't care? On the other hand many pop stars are vapid corporate creations expressing nothing but record companies' profit motives. There's hardly any point in even talking about the music.

So we have the ivory tower and the corporate tower. But what's in between is not just a two-lane highway through a desert! It's not really so bad! There's really a pretty big metropolis built up around that corporate tower where musicians are really making music and people are listening. Abbey Road, Zen Arcade, Neon Bible, Quadrophenia, The College Dropout, Kid A, More Songs About Buildings and Food, just to name a few truly popular albums with substance, none perfect, all with something to say. It's made with multi-track recorders and guitars and stuff, and you don't necessarily sit still when you listen (although, as Benny Goodman observed, sometimes you do, even in the middle of a dance number). Commercial music fills many of the same roles that art music used to, and why shouldn't it? Our dominant mode of production is capitalism, and so we produce and consume culture in the same way. We the people have the money to fund our musicians (and/or the technology to rip off their work) and this is going to result in a different-looking musical culture than the Old-World tradition of composers supported by feudal lords. The Soviet system, while it lasted, had a distinct musical culture, although I don't know much about it. And then, of course, sitting beside these things in all societies, there is folk music, which to me is music that has more to do with family and community than modes of production.

Zander, in his talk, played two pieces, one by Mozart and one by Chopin. So nothing written in the last 100 years. But then again I didn't list any albums recorded in the last two years in my last paragraph -- I wasn't trying to be exhaustive and he certainly wasn't. I don't think it's a coincidence, though. It's clearly important to understand our history and appreciate great works of the past. It's just as important to take that same critical ear to present-day culture. Even if only 3% of people are classical music fans, many more than that listen closely to the pop music that's usually more relevant today. If everyone can understand a bit of Schenker and love a Chopin prelude, everyone can also also appreciate that Bowie, the Talking Heads, and Radiohead all used random processes in their songwriting, just like Cage, and made it listenable even.

Dispatches from Cody, WY

Al: Sorry, I seem to be in your way here.
Jess: Yeah, that corner seems to be the designated spot for doing stuff. We don't have a space problem so much as a space usage problem.
Al: It's just like the United States. All this land and everyone crowds on the east coast for some reason.
Jess: For no reason I can think of. It's muggy and full of bugs and snobs.
Al: I don't know, there might be some nice towns there. Some people like Hartford, CT* for example.
Jess: And some people like being spanked while they pee!


* Once I took an Internet Quizzie Thinger about which city I would be if I were a city, and the result was Hartford, CT.